xxx
2012-03-09 18:31:37 UTC
so, has anyone heard anything out of wolf that makes you think he's
any sort of prodigy, like his pops seems to think? i think he's
adequate and can hold his own on bass but i wouldn't go any further
than that. i think mike's a better player (been playing eons longer
than wolf) but was never given any sort of free reign. seems like mike
was kept on a pretty short leash by king edward, by all accounts.
where i think wolf comes up short (live, anyway) was on harmonies when
he was left to carry them alone. but i have to say when wolf and eddie
sang together, it sounded really good. wolf's shrill and ed's croak
managed to cancel each other out, somehow. i don't know why ed sings
harmonies on some songs and totally ignores them on others. it was a
world of difference when they both sang back-ups when i saw the
chicago show.
but anyway, as far as bass, wolf's no billy sheenan or flea, right?? i
mean, not even close. can we agree on this?
and doesn't it seem a little weird that a kid that young would want to
be in his dad's band, playing with old farts about 40 years his
senior? most 15-20 year old kinds wouldn't want to be hanging with
their old man. they'd want to be doing their own music with friends
their own age. does anyone else find this peculiar? it's like one of
those "what's wrong with this picture" scenarios.
any sort of prodigy, like his pops seems to think? i think he's
adequate and can hold his own on bass but i wouldn't go any further
than that. i think mike's a better player (been playing eons longer
than wolf) but was never given any sort of free reign. seems like mike
was kept on a pretty short leash by king edward, by all accounts.
where i think wolf comes up short (live, anyway) was on harmonies when
he was left to carry them alone. but i have to say when wolf and eddie
sang together, it sounded really good. wolf's shrill and ed's croak
managed to cancel each other out, somehow. i don't know why ed sings
harmonies on some songs and totally ignores them on others. it was a
world of difference when they both sang back-ups when i saw the
chicago show.
but anyway, as far as bass, wolf's no billy sheenan or flea, right?? i
mean, not even close. can we agree on this?
and doesn't it seem a little weird that a kid that young would want to
be in his dad's band, playing with old farts about 40 years his
senior? most 15-20 year old kinds wouldn't want to be hanging with
their old man. they'd want to be doing their own music with friends
their own age. does anyone else find this peculiar? it's like one of
those "what's wrong with this picture" scenarios.